Let us agree that the electoral program is for the holders of executive positions who have the powers and financial and human budgets through which they can implement their programs.
As for members of parliament and advisory councils, they have ideas and visions for future projects, and they can, through the powers of their memberships, urge officials to adopt these visions and ideas.
The matter does not stop motivating, but they defend these visions and ideas, provided that they have the ability to present an integrated feasibility study for projects that serve their regions so that they can defend them, and they do not fail before the first obstacle, and the leader of their ideas is that "there is no stronger person than a person who believes in an idea."
This is in addition to the member’s role in helping to solve some public problems that citizens are exposed to as a result of the issuance of some decisions and laws that may not take into account the privacy of each region and the conditions of its residents, despite the state’s right to issue decisions and laws that preserve rights, whether citizens ’rights with each other or the state’s rights Among the citizens.
However, each region has its own peculiarities. Whatever development occurs in the countryside, a rural citizen cannot receive the same services that an urban citizen gets. Likewise, a citizen residing in urban cities does not receive the same services that a resident of the provincial capitals does.
Likewise, there is no comparison between what the residents of urban governorates get, such as Cairo, Alexandria, Ismailia, and others, with agricultural governorates such as Minya and most of the governorates of Egypt, as each place has its own, so this must be taken into account when decisions and laws are issued, and this is justice in particular.
Add to that the member’s role in facilitating access to some public services that are basically an inherent right of the citizen, but the bureaucracy and routine of some departments make it difficult to obtain this right, except through the intervention of those with authority and influence.
Although this is not the member’s role in the first place if justice was followed in the distribution of services to the citizens, away from favoritism and favoritism, and although these services are an inherent right of the citizen with the state, because of the lack of fair distribution, it has become a more inherent right of the citizen among those who gave them his voice and entrusted them with the judiciary. His needs from members of parliament
Comments
Post a Comment